Navo24 vs Vizion: API-first container tracking, compared

Vizion and Navo24 agree on the important thing: container tracking should be an API, not a dashboard you log into. If you want a clean, normalised container-events feed, Vizion does that well. This page is about where the two diverge.

The short version

Vizion is, at heart, a container-events data provider: normalised tracking you pull into your own systems. Navo24’s TrackingMCP covers the same ground, then adds three things Vizion wasn’t built to be: MCP-native tools an AI assistant calls directly, ETAs predicted from observed delay plus demurrage free-time, and a shared spine with sailing schedules and load planning.

Where Navo24 is different

	Navo24	Vizion
Container events API	Yes, DCSA-normalised	Yes: a core strength
Carriers covered	233 carriers · 125 direct connectors · 186 SCACs	Claims 99% coverage: a genuinely wide net
Fallback sources per carrier	2–3 independent paths, automatic failover	Typically one path per source
AIS feeds	4 live networks fused	Not a published differentiator
Schedule-enriched ETA	Yes: published rotations on 5,000+ lanes overlaid on every box	No comparable schedule overlay
First-party MCP server	Yes: AI agents connect directly	No
Getting started	Self-serve free tier: 5 containers, no card	Sales-led API onboarding
ETA philosophy	Predicted from observed delay, honest “no data”	Carrier/event data forward
Beyond tracking	Schedules + load planning on one spine	Tracking-data focused

When Vizion is the better call

If all you need is a robust, well-documented container-events feed to power your own product, Vizion is a focused, capable choice. Its 99% coverage claim reflects a genuinely wide net. The trade-off is the path in: Vizion’s API is sales-led, while Navo24 gives you 233 carriers, 2–3 fallback sources per carrier and schedule-enriched ETAs on a free tier you can wire in this afternoon.

When Navo24 is the better call

Choose Navo24 if you’re building an AI assistant that needs grounded freight tools (not just a data feed), if you want predicted ETAs and demurrage free-time rather than raw events, or if sailing schedules and load planning matter alongside tracking, and you want them sharing one data layer. Every ETA is cross-checked against published sailings on 5,000+ lanes and 4 fused AIS feeds, and you can start on the free tier without talking to anyone.

See TrackingMCP → · Explore the suite →

This comparison reflects publicly understood positioning and may not capture every feature of either product. Tell us where it’s wrong and we’ll fix it.